Home > Uncategorized > No Room at the Inn

No Room at the Inn

Well Christmas, the annual celebration of events that did not happen, is upon us once again.  The revered Christmas story is just that– a story, a prime example of the extent to which religiosity is based on fantasy.   The particularly puzzling thing to me is that the biblical text itself does not support the popular understanding of the Christmas story.

Take, for example, the famous “inn” which turned away Joseph and his pregnant (virgin!) wife.    The word that gets translated “inn” in Luke’s Christmas narrative is kataluma  in Greek. (Luke 2:7)   The only other time the word appears in the entire New Testament is in Luke 22:11, when the disciples are looking for a place to celebrate the Passover before Jesus’ death.  In that instance, most English versions translate the same word  kataluma, as “guest-room.”

Earlier, in the parable of the Good Samaritan, when the author of Luke’s gospel actually does want to indicate an inn, he uses an entirely different word, pandokeion,  which is unambiguously not a guest-room, but, rather, specifically an inn. (Luke 10:34)

Furthermore, as to the barn out back where the baby was born, there was no barn out back!   Archaeologists have shown that homes in 1st century Palestine featured an area just inside the entrance where livestock would be brought in at night.

So Mary and Joseph were not turned away by a hostile inn-keeper.   They were visiting Joseph’s ancestral home, Bethlehem.  There were clearly relatives there who would take them in.  The biblical text merely indicates that the guest room was already taken so they had to stay in the foyer, where the livestock were usually kept.  But they were not turned away into the cold night.

There isn’t any basis in the Christian Bible  for most of the rituals and symbolism that developed around the birth narrative.   Why do Christians get upset about not being able to display Nativity scenes on public property when their own holy writings provide no justification for a belief in the historicity of such tableaux.   This year when you drive by the local congregation staging the “Live Nativity Scene,”  you might want to stop and point out some of these inconsistencies to the actors.  But I guess that would be tacky.

And the myth endures.


Categories: Uncategorized
  1. Richard Goscicki
    November 23, 2011 at 3:17 am

    As I understand it, Luke is the only book of the New Testament that describes the Nativity at all. So, at the Council of Nicaea 325, where Luke was a last-minute inclusion as a compromise, the story of the baby Jesus would never have been included in Christian lore.

    We wouldn’t have Christian Holiday sales, Santa Claus and a week off from school. I can picture some of the attendant bishops bragging, “See, I told you we better include the Luke.”

    • November 23, 2011 at 4:13 am

      Nice! That’s exactly what most history boils down to–compromises at conventions and conferences. Kind of makes me wonder what else would be different today if they had done things just a bit differently at Nicea. For example, what if they had settled on “homoiousios” rather than “homoousious.” Then Mitt Romney’s doctrine of the Trinity would be “orthodox” and no big deal for the evangelicals to swallow.

  2. kittybrat
    November 25, 2011 at 10:44 pm

    Thank you for a wonderful smile! Your observations are correct, and damn inconvenient to the unthinking and proud of it followers of the myth. Bravo!

  3. Andrew
    November 26, 2011 at 2:18 pm

    The Council of Nicea had nothing to do with canonizing scriptures. Luke was accepted as canon along with the other gospels as early as the mid second century.

    • December 4, 2011 at 6:27 am

      Scripture was canonized in response to another guy trying to fudge his own Bible. It was also compiled by a bunch of men who decided themselves what should go in and what shouldn’t. There’s no proof that God had any part in this process besides the self-assurance of the Scripture. This leaves us with no evidence to believe that it is the inspired word of God.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: